Current time: 21st May 2013, 06:02

Our server costs $125 a month to run. Since January 2013 we have raised $263.37.
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can. Also visit our sister site: Freethought Forums!
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
20th January 2009, 17:50
Post: #1
  1k posts! 4 years membership!
The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
How's this for irony?
Australian writer Harry Nicolaides has been jailed for 3 years by a Thai court because his book " Versimilitude " was held to be insulting to the Thai Royal Family.
The presiding judge said passages " suggested there was abuse of Royal power ".
You just couldn't script it!
( must get hold of the book! )
HuhA man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 18:38
Post: #2
  10k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
A Republic Democracy like the US is the only way to go.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 18:42
Post: #3
  4k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
Nonsense. A democracy with monarchs is no worse or better.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Rate user Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 18:46
Post: #4
  10k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
A democracy has no purpose for monarchs. They are a waste of space and money.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 19:37
Post: #5
  4k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
Irrelevant. You claimed its the only way to go and it isn't.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Rate user Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 20:31
Post: #6
  10k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
I used the phrase "only way to go" as an allusion to my preference to how the government of America works. I didn't mean it was literally the only working system of government. I just think it is the best.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 21:37
Post: #7
  2k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
(20th January 2009 20:31)Tiberius Wrote:  I used the phrase "only way to go" as an allusion to my preference to how the government of America works. I didn't mean it was literally the only working system of government. I just think it is the best.


Yeeaaaaa America. Big Grin
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | ::Podcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Rate user Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 23:10
Post: #8
  1k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
(20th January 2009 18:42)leo-rcc Wrote:  Nonsense. A democracy with monarchs is no worse or better.
I disagree. The UK monarchy holds up the class structure and is reactionary.
In essence, all monarchies are anathema to the idea of equality.
HuhA man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 23:31
Post: #9
  10k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
The UK monarchy also serves no purpose other than to absolve parliament so a new one can be elected. Really it should just be written in the constitution and the process would be a lot easier. I'd much prefer a head of state that actually had their arse on the line rather than on a throne with no possibility of being held responsible for their actions.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20th January 2009, 23:34
Post: #10
  1k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: The problem with Royalty ( or why I'm a Republican )
(20th January 2009 23:31)Tiberius Wrote:  The UK monarchy also serves no purpose other than to absolve parliament so a new one can be elected. Really it should just be written in the constitution and the process would be a lot easier. I'd much prefer a head of state that actually had their arse on the line rather than on a throne with no possibility of being held responsible for their actions.

The point is that all the royals have to do to keep their privileged position is procreate.
The hereditary principle is archaic.
The advantage of a republic is that you get to elect AND SACK the elected head of state.
HuhA man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Fuck the Pope and the Republican party popeyespappy 3 361 5th October 2012 06:54
Last Post: cato123
  Male Rape - An Invisible Problem Hovik 76 3377 22nd June 2012 11:15
Last Post: Tiberius
  Is there a solution to this problem? Ace Otana 45 4672 26th January 2011 14:45
Last Post: thesummerqueen



User(s) browsing this thread: