Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 7:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
#1
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid...
I would like to be able to build a better argument...
"We need not a God; just another human being to give life a meaning. For people are truly all people have" author unknown

Reply
#2
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Quote:He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy.

No, you don't.

Your friend is an ignoramus,I really wouldn't bother Be.like trying to communicate with an Orangutang. However,if you must:

Refer him to the notion of ETHICS, aka moral philosophy,based on reason,not science..,


Quote:Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a branch of philosophy that addresses questions about morality — that is, concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, justice, virtue, etc.
Major branches of ethics include:
Meta-ethics, about the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions and how their truth-values (if any) may be determined;
Normative ethics, about the practical means of determining a moral course of action;
Applied ethics, about how moral outcomes can be achieved in specific situations;
Moral psychology, about how moral capacity or moral agency develops and what its nature is; and
Descriptive ethics, about what moral values people actually abide by.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_philosophy

Reply
#3
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Scientific answer.


Quote:Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends.

Gandalf The Gray.
Reply
#4
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
@Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
#5
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(September 21, 2010 at 12:08 am)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

Scientific answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_evolution



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#6
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(September 21, 2010 at 12:37 pm)tackattack Wrote: @Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.

The moss copied 7 commandments from the Egyptian book of the dead
Reply
#7
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(September 21, 2010 at 12:08 am)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

It's pretty simple how to answer this- firstly your friend (although why you want to be friends with a person like that is beyond me) needs to be reminded that you don't have to explain or justify your position. Your views are based on logic and common sense, and common sense has been around far longer than the idea of gods, christianity or supposed morality. A neanderthal understood that if he stuck a spear in his friend, his friend would die, therefore he wouldn't do it. That is common sense.

Christians love to claim a monopoly on morality, but they have no basis for this whatsoever.

Furthermore, after many attempts myself, I would no longer bother trying to deconvert a christian. Because frankly this planet was ours long before it was taken over by the sheep and their god of delusions; it's christianity that is the new kid on the block, not atheists, and the way it swaggers about proclaiming hither and dither is well deserving of an ass kicking.

Devil
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply
#8
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Who needs a scientific answer when you have George Carlin?





“Society is not a disease, it is a disaster. What a stupid miracle that one can live in it.” ~ E.M. Cioran
Reply
#9
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
#10
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(September 21, 2010 at 3:34 pm)tackattack Wrote: Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.

He's right, I already brought this up recently ..

http://atheistforums.org/thread-4684.html
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 6320 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 7389 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Moral universalism and theism Interaktive 20 1754 May 6, 2022 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  It's Darwin Day tomorrow - logic and reason demands merriment! Duty 7 730 February 13, 2022 at 10:21 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  No reason justifies disbelief. Catharsis 468 38586 March 30, 2019 at 6:57 pm
Last Post: fredd bear
  What is your reason for being an atheist? dimitrios10 43 8480 June 6, 2018 at 10:47 am
Last Post: DodosAreDead
  Religion stifles Moral Evolution Cecelia 107 14831 December 4, 2017 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Astreja
  Does religion expose the shortcomings of empathy based moral systems henryp 19 2353 December 2, 2017 at 7:54 pm
Last Post: henryp
  a challenge All atheists There is inevitably a Creator. Logic says that suni_muslim 65 14155 November 28, 2017 at 5:02 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Creationist Moral Panic Amarok 15 5570 June 13, 2017 at 10:42 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)