Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:48 am
Atheist Forums › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
    Thread: Proving Divine
Post: RE: Proving Divine
(July 15, 2012 at 2:39 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You know, when staff redacts a link in your post, that doesn't mean you should be copy pasting the content of said link. In two separate threads, n...
 subtlecalmingflow General Science 7 2559 July 15, 2012 at 2:47 pm
    Thread: scientific fact of the Divine
Post: RE: scientific fact of the Divine
(July 15, 2012 at 2:36 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:Therefore the Divine is natural. Where have I seen this kind of stupidity before...... Oh, yeah.............. [Image: http://imnewbieschool.com/v...
 subtlecalmingflow Skepticism & Pseudoscience 33 16986 July 15, 2012 at 2:42 pm
    Thread: Proving Divine
Post: RE: Proving Divine
(July 15, 2012 at 2:27 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: I call bullshit. "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" in the case of this proof, "logical tautology" would be 'ev...
 subtlecalmingflow General Science 7 2559 July 15, 2012 at 2:38 pm
    Thread: scientific fact of the Divine
Post: RE: scientific fact of the Divine
(July 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm)Annik Wrote: If anything, this disproves anything divine. :/ Did you mean to say it disproves the existence of theistic gods?
 subtlecalmingflow Skepticism & Pseudoscience 33 16986 July 15, 2012 at 2:34 pm
    Thread: scientific fact of the Divine
Post: scientific fact of the Divine
energy is eternal proof; ∑E = Ek+Ep Scientific Fact (1); Conservation of energy; energy cannot be created nor destroyed. energy cannot be created ergo by time reversal symmetry it is a scienti...
 subtlecalmingflow Skepticism & Pseudoscience 33 16986 July 15, 2012 at 2:11 pm
    Thread: Proving Divine
Post: Proving Divine
What if it's done? ************ the empty set exists proof; (|- ∃{}) Assuming nothing (i.e. having no non-logical axioms), it follows that there is an assuming, or thinking; And this thinking,...
 subtlecalmingflow General Science 7 2559 July 15, 2012 at 1:37 pm