Science Porn

[SteelCurtain]

The 777's ILS keeps the main landing gear parallel to the runway. He overcorrected with the rudder, though, and had to bring it back.

[SteelCurtain]

Archer Fish is a Boss:


Removing rust with a laser:


Pool during an earthquake:

[SteelCurtain]

Umm.... You Kiwis have been keeping this shit a secret?!?

[Exian]

Vibes

[youtube]INqfM1kdfUc[/youtube]

[SteelCurtain]

---

Vibes

[youtube]INqfM1kdfUc[/youtube]

---

That's really awesome. One of my favorite viners uses that effect a lot.

https://vine.co/Trench

Seriously worth a check out. He uses his adorable pup in his vines a lot, too.

This is a nanoinjector. It's how they inject cells with DNA. The ball is 100μm in diameter.

Light bouncing off a mirror. Remember, pico is 10⁻¹².


Buzz Aldrin took a selfie. FROM SPACE.

[SteelCurtain]

Some badass pictures of old.

A capture of lightning in Kent in 1899.


Pictures of the moon from 1858-1859.


Photos of the Orion Nebula from 1875.

[pocaracas]

Watching Uranium Emit Radiation Inside A Cloud Chamber Is Mesmerising!

[Alex K]

Haha nice, the radioactive waltz

---

A bunch of really cool stuff since I last looked. Man, that nano injector gives me the shivers. Imagine being that cell!

[SteelCurtain]

One of my favorite webcomics, xkcd, puts out a secondary comic, "What If?", where the creator fields physics questions. The results are fantastic.

Flagpole
So, you're falling from a height above the tallest building in your town, and you don't have a parachute. But wait! Partway down the side of that skyscraper there's a flagpole sticking out, sans flag! You angle your descent and grab the pole just long enough to swing around so that when you let go you're now heading back up toward the sky. As gravity slows you and brings you to a halt, you reach the top of the skyscraper, where you reach out and pull yourself to safety. What's the likelihood this could happen?
Rex Ungericht

If you're like me, your first thought on hearing this question was, "That's ridiculous; there's no way that could work."

Your first thought is right. But just to be sure, let's take a closer look.

Grip strength depends on a lot of factors, like hand slickness and surface material. But for the moment, let's assume Rex's hands are able to grab the pole tightly. What happens to the rest of his body?

It's hard to find good numbers on how much force it takes to tear off a person's arm. (Which is probably a good thing, to be honest) There are threads on the question on MetaFilter and the Straight Dope message boards, and frequent discussion of the death of Robert-François Damiens, (Damiens was tortured to death for attempting to assassinate Louis XV, but a team of horses had trouble tearing him limb from limb,) but not too much hard data.

For the record, there are lots of studies and lectures on the breaking strength of tendons, which tend to give values of around 50-150 MPa. That's stronger than skin (27 MPa) but weaker than bone (120 MPa). However, to figure out the overall strength of the arm, we need to tally up all the tendons, muscles, and tissues in the wrist, arm, and shoulder, their cross-sectional area, and figure out which parts would be put under strain in what order.

Instead, it might be easier to consider people who try to pull off this maneuver in real life: Gymnasts.

A gymnast on the uneven parallel bars pushes the human body to its limits while performing maneuvers very similar to Rex's flagpole stunt. (In some ways, at least.) A 2009 study used 3D motion capture to measure the forces involved in an elite gymnast's routine. They found that the athlete's hands exerted a force of over 3 kN on the bar at the bottom of a swing. In other words, the gymnast was briefly supporting almost 700 lbs of weight.

Let's be generous and assume that Rex is even better than the elite gymnast in the study. (After all, the gymnast has to worry about long-term injury, while Rex's concerns are a lot more short-term). Suppose Rex's arms can handle a swing force of over 10 kN, three times more than the gymnast (and twice as much as these guys!). How will he do?

Let's see how much force Rex needs to withstand. The "tallest building in town" here in Boston is the 240-meter-tall Hancock Tower; if he jumped off the top, he'd be going nearly 100 mph by the time he was halfway down. At that speed, the force on his arms (speed squared over the radius of his turn (which is effectively somewhere between 1 and 2 meters here.)) would be around ... 100 kN.

Really, the numbers are just telling us what common sense told us from the start: You can't grab hold of something while going 100 mph, much less swing around it.

If you want get a more vivid intuitive sense of the forces involved, consider this: In 2006, GQ put baseball star Albert Pujols in a lab and measured his swing. They clocked the speed of his bat at 87 mph, similar to the speed of the flagpole relative to our falling person.

So if you want to pull off Rex's stunt, first go find Albert Pujols, have him swing his bat as hard as you can ... and try to grab it.

And remember: You're just trying to stop the momentum of a 31-ounce piece of wood. When you're falling past the flagpole, you're going to be catching your whole body, so it's going to be up to 100 times worse.

Good luck!

[Exian]

We could probably start a dedicated 3D printing thread and have new material every month.

Here's a new technique by Carbon 3D called continuous liquid interface production that claims to be 25-100 times faster than any other method.

---

[youtube]VTJq9Z5g4Jk[/youtube]

---

To accomplish this, these scientists took advantage of a problem typically associated with 3D printing methods that relies on light to initiate polymerization (photo-polymerization): the ability to control oxygen levels. When present, oxygen reacts with the polymerizing chains, which significantly slows down the reaction. Oxygen must therefore be limited for the curing process, which hardens the product. In 3D printing, the material is typically printed in air and cured under a UV light; since oxygen is likely present, this process is slower than it could be.

The new technique proceeds by projecting a continuous sequence of UV images through the bottom of an oxygen-permeable, UV-transparent window. The window is below a liquid resin bath that is essentially a solution of chemical reactants. This window allows a small amount of oxygen to enter, creating a “dead zone” where the curing process cannot proceed. As a result, the dead zone maintains a liquid interface directly above it. The UV images then pattern the structure as it emerges from the dead zone.