RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
August 9, 2015 at 7:22 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2015 at 7:22 pm by Salacious B. Crumb.)
Atheist demonstrates how there isn't any evidence for an invisible man in the sky. Theist continues his/her script, not listening to one thing the atheist says. Many audience members think they've both made good points, when in fact, they haven't.
Good choice Dawkins; you do have more important things to do. The theists will ridicule you, but that's because they are too butthurt, because every single argument of theirs has failed miserably, and they are completely out of them.. WHY? Because there is no evidence for a god. End of debate.
Good choice Dawkins; you do have more important things to do. The theists will ridicule you, but that's because they are too butthurt, because every single argument of theirs has failed miserably, and they are completely out of them.. WHY? Because there is no evidence for a god. End of debate.
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' -Isaac Asimov-
