(September 29, 2015 at 10:59 pm)Godschild Wrote:(September 29, 2015 at 5:04 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: No, it's in the Qur'an. That means finding those items would justify Islam (as well as Christianity and Judaism). They have every reason to want a story from the Qur'an (as well as the Old Testament on which it is based) to be verified by such a find as the chariots destroyed by Moses/God.
Why in the world would they not want Surah 26:52-67 verified by finding the chariot wheels?!
It would make the Jews a nation coming out of Egypt legitimate with God and the world, they are not going to stand for a legitimate Israel, I really don't want to get into who's God is real on this itwould just take us into an area that's to unsettled.
GC
You really don't know much about Islam, do you? I don't mean that as a term of disrespect, but I do mean that the guy is profiting off the average Christian not knowing what Muslims really think, or how they operate. You're telling me that Muslims let thousands of legitimate archaeologists visit and legally dig/research at sites all across the Middle East, let tourists go to their countries for numerous reasons, even to live (in places like Egypt) and attend universities, yet they won't let this one guy go there because they're afraid of what he will find?
Not the legitimate archaeologists... just him? Seriously?
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
