(March 1, 2009 at 2:52 pm)Even Adam Wrote: There is no evidence for any god(this is something with which you apparently agree). They are, therefore, choosing faith over evidence. If they were choosing evidence over faith, they wouldn't believe in any gods.There can't be evidence for God, yes, that's what I'm postulating.
You can't have a faith in God with evidence. They are, therefore, mutually exclusive ways of determining what is real.
(March 1, 2009 at 2:52 pm)Even Adam Wrote: The lack of evidence for God means that we have no reason to think that God is there, while basing your representation of reality on faith allows for belief in god. How is this not a conflict?There's that 'reason' word again. Reason is involved, evidence isn't.
So you're saying that for those who believe God to exist (necessarily without evidence), have conflict with physical reality? Can you give me one example of that being true?