(October 13, 2015 at 6:21 pm)sinnerdaniel94 Wrote:(October 13, 2015 at 6:10 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I find it more than a little bit trollish that ol' Daniel could have participated in so many of our discussions complaining about the Bible's support of genocide in the name of God, and then have the balls to ask us on what basis we condemn Hitler.
I do have the balls to ask you that question and I've yet to receive an answer.
No you don't, you have the asshole. We have had literally hundreds of discussions for the basis of secular morality, as is being repeatedly pointed out to you, including ones in which I have seen you participate.
You have also watched us explain that we consider your Bible immoral because of its divine justification for genocide.
Between those two facts, if you still are going to pretend we have no basis to object to Hitler, you're either incapable of retaining information you read (in which case why should we respond to you now?), you're deliberately trolling us for harassment (in which case why should we respond to you now?), or you're so bigoted against atheists that you'd just ignore whatever we said in favor of what you claim to already think (in which case why should we respond to you now?).
Ass. Hole.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
