(January 5, 2016 at 11:07 am)Stimbo Wrote: Problem is though, Drich, is that we're not having a conversation with the documentary maker; we're having it with you. If you're standing behind the video to the extent that all you're going to do is continually point to it in the face of any objection, we're not going to get anywhere. Why not summarise the points that you think answer the objections and explain why you think that? You know - discussion, like in a forum?
Is it your opinion that I have not been doing this very thing for 19 pages?
I have no issue repackaging what is in the movie for this forum. However when a question is asked for the 10th time, to me it is apparent my efforts are falling short. I do not have the CG or chart's/graphs used in the movie to illustrate the point the movie makes so easy to understand. So the easy answer would be to simply watch the movie.