(January 7, 2016 at 12:54 am)Judi Lynn Wrote:(January 7, 2016 at 12:42 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: You admitted to being dishonest. The fact that you admit to having done something, doesn't take anything away from what you did. You weren't explicit about your dishonest ways before you put them to work, so I couldn't have proved it until you admitted it yourself, which you just did.
You know, making some sort of sense instead of rambling off like a babbling idiot would go a long way. You can't even show me where, in the last few pages here, I'm being dishonest. You think your circular talk is going to work and that I'll just give up? Listen closely shit for brains, you make zero sense. You can't even hold a reasonable insult war because you're too stupid to sense sarcasm when it's right in front of you. If anyone is being dishonest it's you, dude. You can't even comprehend a simple argument, let alone participate in it.
Dishonesty isn't something you can prove, at least not in such an environment, barring admission from the source, which I have. You admitted to ignoring what I said and instead strawmanning me in order to get a rise out of me. That is both dishonest and trolling. I already gave you the definition for trolling, now I'll provide you with the definition for dishonesty, since you seem to be confused about what it actually means.
deceitfulness shown in someone's character or behavior.
The deceitfulness being contained in the fact that you ignored what I said and instead strawmanned me.
