(January 7, 2016 at 12:57 am)Judi Lynn Wrote:We can be used like that in the following scenarios:(January 7, 2016 at 12:47 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: But it doesn't matter what we call you. The fact of the matter is, you just confirmed you're not here to have a rational, honest conversation about anything. Instead, you're here to make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. Which happens to be the textbook definition of a troll, which is a bannable offense on these forums, if I'm not mistaken.Who is "we"? The only person who is participating in this besides you is me, so unless you have an imaginary friend, you'll have to do better than this.
A troll? Lol that's rich coming from you. You've done exactly that in just about every thread you've participated in since you've joined.
used in formal contexts for or by a royal person, or by a writer or editor, to refer to himself or herself.
used condescendingly to refer to the person being addressed.
I'm happy to teach you some more english, I'm not here to rub it in, especially since I know you're an American, so that's why you're so uneducated, lazy and arrogant(not to mention other, more personal stuff I won't get into), which I won't blame you for. But I do expect you to admit when you're wrong.
I never addmited to being a troll, which doesn't make me one. Try and prove it otherwise, you won't be able to. I have justification for everything I ever posted, which I can prove wasn't trolling. You? You just admitted to being one, no other possible meaning involved.