RE: For those who want proof of the exodus
January 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2016 at 8:42 pm by Angrboda.)
(January 7, 2016 at 3:54 pm)Drich Wrote:(January 7, 2016 at 3:45 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: When you make statements like this, Drich, it makes you sound like the one who didn't watch the movie. Yes the time shift does affect things in the final period, and that was explicitly stated in the film; they spent 5-10 minutes talking about it.
I've watched it 3 times, in my notes taken stright from the movie i write: 'a time shift between the middle kingdom and the New kingdom only affects the middle Kingdom. it moves it forward 300 years. the time period of the New Kingdom (the time of Ramses) does not change.' That is what is explained in the final illustration/graphic when the to bar graphs are moved together when the 2nd darkage is shortened by 300 years.
I've never known you to be reliable in comprehending what you read, why would a film be different?
Wikipedia Wrote:Implications for Egypt and her Neighbours
Redating the reign of Ramesses II to three centuries later than that given by the conventional chronology would not only reposition the date of the Battle of Kadesh and revise the linked chronology of Hittite history, it would also require a revision of the chronology of Assyrian history prior to 911 BC. Given the dependence of Hittite chronology on Egyptian chronology,[24] a lowering of Egyptian dates would result in a lowering of the end of the Hittite New Kingdom and a resulting reduction (or complete removal) of the Anatolian Dark Age.[25]
Wikipedia | New Chronology (Rohl)