(January 11, 2016 at 5:45 pm)Irrational Wrote:(January 11, 2016 at 5:37 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: I never claimed that the Bible does not contain some archaeological (and historical) accuracies.
The problem is, it contains so many inaccuracies.
That's a key flaw with athrock's way of reasoning in this thread. Athrock seems to only focus on supporting evidence but ignores negating evidence.
(January 11, 2016 at 6:16 pm)Helio Nimbus Wrote:(January 11, 2016 at 5:45 pm)Irrational Wrote: That's a key flaw with athrock's way of reasoning in this thread. Athrock seems to only focus on supporting evidence but ignores negating evidence.
That's what I was thinking. I wonder if he thinks the same re: the burden of proof on Gods existence.
Will have a read through.
Incorrect.
I'm aware of the negative evidence, but so far, I'm simply not impressed by it.
This is the same approach taken by Simon Moon in the quote from him in my signature below, so, I'm following a well-trod path, I think.