RE: Religious Liberty?
February 16, 2016 at 7:59 am
(This post was last modified: February 16, 2016 at 8:00 am by bennyboy.)
(February 16, 2016 at 3:08 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm not sure that religious freedom means the ability to impose one's beliefs upon the facts. As Steel Curtain noted, they are using a scientifically invalid criterion for what is and isn't an abortifacient in order to impose their views.
They have the right to their own beliefs. They do not have the right to their own facts.
That's right. Value judgments are expected to be skewed and biased. Factual observations must not be. When facts are deliberately skewed in order to support a value judgment, then there's a problem.
If you say reproduction is good, and you believe that avoiding it is immoral, okay. If you make shit up about "legitimate" rape and other bullshit like that, you need to be removed from the gene pool, ideally on the front grille of my pickup.