Trump versus Clinton?

[KUSA]

Wont in what context? You wont dishwash 40 hours a week, why? Because you don't have to. So does that give me the right to force you to  dishwash? 

If that's all you can get then you should do it or go hungry.

Again, I would hate to be your spouse, I could see you coming home to your stay at home wife "FUCK YOU I PAY ALL THE BILLS".

My wife has a six figure income like I do. We are equals. I wouldn't be married to a lazy fuck.

What is really moronic is you think "sink or swim" is economical. Nope, it costs more to society to dump people in the street where they can become desperate, then we imprison them for mostly non violent crimes and mix them in with violent people so that when they get out we have to deal with even worse off people.

So I should pay your lazy ass so you don't rob me?

Criminalizing poverty is what you are doing. It is not only bad economics, it is sick and immoral.

Not at all. I am not criminalizing poverty. You are incentivizing and promoting laziness. It looks like you have it figured out too. You are a deadbeat taker.

And again, you also stupidly think because I don't value the same things you do, I am somehow saying everyone has to be poor as some class loyalty oath which is bullshit. You also stupidly assume that because I say people don't want the same things you do, somehow I am claiming nobody should be paid more and nobody should move up, which is also bullshit.

I'm sure you don't want everyone to be poor. Who would pay your bills then?

You aren't making any argument for anything but your own selfishness.

You are the selfish one. You don't want to work and pay your own way. I don't have any desire to live off someone else so I work.

The better you educate people, and the more you pay them and the healthier they are, it makes society MORE stable. "Fuck you I got mine" does not make you compassionate nor does it make you an economist.

If you had a masters degree and was the healthiest libtard on the planet, you would still be a lazy taker.