(March 15, 2016 at 3:08 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You're doing no such thing Steve, you're referring to an equation which assumes a probability for the miraculous and then solves, purportedly, for the probability of the miraculous.
If I told you that I could show how many marbles were left in a jar by reference to an equation that contained within it a variable that was defined as the number of marbles left in a jar...then the equation isn't showing me how many marbles are left in the jar.
I thought I'd made that pretty clear before, but if you're having trouble understanding, speak up.
Then you don't understand the theorem. Read the link-- it has better descriptions than earlier. This has been around for 250 years.
If you are still banging on the "miracles have a zero probability" drum, then you tell me why.