(April 11, 2016 at 6:07 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 5:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. Some people may very well get off on that specific type of scenario. The point is, should we take the risk at the expense of women? The risk can easily be avoided with a third, gender neutral bathroom.
Also, should the requirement for transgender folks without surgical reassignment using the opposite sex bathroom/lockerroom be that they are in "full drag?" What if they're at the gym, or only had time to put on a little lipstick and padded bra that day?
I agree that a third bathroom would salve the issue, but here in FL a school went through the trouble of installing a 3rd bathroom all over campus for 1 person who signed an agreement to use that bathroom, which now she has renigged on and is using the boys bathroom as the 3rd bathroom infringes on her rights. (Claiming segeration/white and black bathrooms of the 1960s)