(April 13, 2016 at 11:53 am)Drich Wrote: Two things you example is not one I've listed.
Second I have posted 3 local news stories of sexual assualts against women in bathrooms from supposed 'transgendered/pervs pretending to be.'
From a rape on the bathroom floor to some dude in a dress planting spy cams.
Don't tell me it's crap, it's happening now and local new agencies are reporting it. National news will not because they are trying to push the lgbt agenda.
Know why those dudes dress as women? Because they want to go into the women's bathroom and commit crimes. They are perverts. Even as the laws already are (and even where it is illegal to go into them if you have a penis), it doesn't change those guys' actions one little bit. If transgendered people were non-existent, those men would still dress as women in order to sneak into the women's bathroom.
In order to make an anti-trans law, you'd have to establish that it's actual trans people who are seeking to enter other bathrooms for the purpose of committing a crime, rather than just to pee in the bathroom appropriate to how they dress and behave and think.
As the other poster already pointed out, forcing trans people into the OTHER bathroom will cause distress because they appear to be in the wrong bathroom.
Trying to assert that it's okay to discriminate against trans people because of the actions of (straight male) perverts is like saying that you can't take your kids anywhere unsupervised by women because there exists such a thing as a child molester. It's ridiculous, and you'd (rightly) object to any law which tried to paint you with the same brush as a pervert simply because you have a penis.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
