(April 15, 2016 at 9:16 pm)Losty Wrote:(April 15, 2016 at 9:14 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Well you're not really making an argument. You're just saying "He has to do it because the laws are there. What you said is stupid". That's not really an argument.
I'm not saying there isn't an argument to be said against what I'm saying but you're not making any sort of sensible argument.
You're right. Your argument about how bakers being forced to make cakes for gays is the same as women being forced to fuck any man who wants her was so much more sensible
I wasn't specifically talking about bakers making cakes for gays in my example I was talking about hiring policies. But yes that comparison does also work as I pointed out in my other post.
They both involve people having control over what they own.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.