(May 27, 2016 at 12:45 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You mean...other than this 20 some odd page long defense of the compatibility of free will and foreknowledge?
No, I mean: Regarding the pages in which I have been active (beginning in page 11, #108), where do I define free-will as you claimed that I did? If I actually did, I want to recognize and correct my error. If I actually didn't, then it is something I would like to address before continuing.
Why would I continue discussing the topic with you if you assign meaning to my statements that I don't intend and explicitly intend otherwise? I get it if people, myself included, make mistakes and misinterpret language from time to time. I do it all of the time. If both of us hope to have a meaningful discussion, a mutual willingness to come to an understanding of the other is necessary. It requires a little patience. If you are not willing to do that, just let me know and I'll bow out, no hard feelings.
Quote:Shall we begin afresh? What is free will, as you understand it?
Would you believe that I ALREADY defined it in my very first post in this thread... AND YOU REPLIED TO THAT POST ... but you didn't address the definition? =)