RE: My argument against God(s) & omnipresence
May 29, 2016 at 1:00 am
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2016 at 1:00 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(May 28, 2016 at 6:43 am)Shadow_Man Wrote: pool the great,
pool the great Wrote:God is omnipresent.
Nothing subset of everything.
Nothing only consists of nothing.
* God exists in everything.
* God exists in nothing.
* God doesn't exist.
If your logic is correct
and
you substitute "universe" for "God"
then
you have disproven the existence of the universe.
Since we observe that the universe exists, there must necessarily be a problem with your logic.
Regards,
Shadow_Man
Very smart.
Let's start:
Universe is omnipresent. (replacing God as per your request)
We know that universe consists of everything.
So,
Universe is omnipresent =>
Everything is everywhere.
We know that statement is false. Everything is not everywhere,something is everywhere(observation) . So you can't disprove the existence of the universe with my argument. Get it? :-)