(June 11, 2016 at 2:53 am)Dust_bunny Wrote:(June 10, 2016 at 6:47 pm)RozKek Wrote: Let's make a situation here. Let's say 3-5% of all circumcised men lose their sensitivty, would you circumcise your child in that case?
It would have to be causation, not just correlation. If that were the case then yes I would change my mind. How many uncircumcised men loose their sensitivity?
It is causation. We lose lots and lots of nerve cells. The glans grows a
layer of keration making the glans (the most sensitive part of the penis in the majority of men) very hard or nearly impossible to stimulate unless you use enough friction to start a fire. Which results in death grip syndrome desensitizing you to all other stimulations. The inner skin is also sensitive and that is also cut. The frenulum is very sensitive, that is cut away. The lack of gliding function makes it much more easier to stimulate the penis. There are men who have have gotten circumcised as adults, at first their sensitivity skyrockets because their sensitive glans is exposed 24/7 but after a while it dries out, keratinizes and loses its sensitivity gradually. Some of those men have manually restored by tugging and stretching the inner and outer foreskin to regrow it gradually and they've reported getting a lot of their sensitivity back. Still a correlation?
