(June 11, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Losty Wrote:(June 11, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Aegon Wrote: There are huge differences between male and female circumcision. FMG affects the girl's ability to become pregnant later on in life, it is way more commonly botched, and way more tissue and nerve endings are removed. The rate of botched male circumcisions are relatively much lower.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/co...130/3/e756
"Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits from male circumcision were identified for the prevention of urinary tract infections, acquisition of HIV, transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer. Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction."
Female circumcision is not generally the horror stories you see in the news. It's just a trimming of the labia minora and the clitoral hood.
Why is it ok to mutilate a genitals if you're less likely to royally fuck it up?
Just pointing out that the comparison isn't as simple as you put it. And you ignored my link.
![[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]](https://external-preview.redd.it/nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWTNVY.jpg?width=216&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=7b11e8b38bea0eacc8797fc971574ddc2a24480e)