If arguments like the teleological argument are gateway drugs into the sordid world of theological sophistry, the ontological argument is the hard stuff. By the time you believe that, you're mainlining a priori reason. You're a hard, pipe-hittin' apologist.
Although it's tragic to watch someone descend into this level of navel-gazing, it's probably good for atheism. The ontological argument is notoriously unpersuasive. You'd probably make a better case for Christianity by dropping trou and running around yelling, "I'm a weiner!"
Although it's tragic to watch someone descend into this level of navel-gazing, it's probably good for atheism. The ontological argument is notoriously unpersuasive. You'd probably make a better case for Christianity by dropping trou and running around yelling, "I'm a weiner!"
A Gemma is forever.
