(June 20, 2016 at 11:48 pm)IATIA Wrote:(June 20, 2016 at 11:43 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: The ontological arguement is valid, insofar as valid propositions are made to support the notion.
The whole ontological argument is simply that god is possible, therefore god exists.
For this argument to even have a chance at working, one must show that a god is possible.
I do not accept that a god is possible, therefore there is no god.
See how that works.
I have just deleted my response, you would gather what it would be, from my previous post. But again I will state, I cannt see your point, that God is apparently necessary also that ontologicial is self explinatory.( We are simply rationalizing words into existence by using these phrases is my feelings.)
