(July 28, 2016 at 10:18 pm)Losty Wrote:(July 28, 2016 at 10:13 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: So what you're saying is that a man named Jesus (who did in fact exist), who was prophesied to be hung on a tree and not a bone of his would be broken but he would be pierced through (keep in mind that that the Romans broke crucifixees legs for maximum suffering, yet they didn't brake Jesus legs, were the Roman in on this whole prophecy thing also?)
How the hell is that what I was saying!? You quoted my post but did not read it...
I read what you wrote.
I took what you said about the scriptures being written after the fact (by which you can only be referring to the new testament) to mean the Jesus's story was written to conform to old testament prophecy, my point was that there are too many outlying factors for that to be possible, unless your attributing those factors to coincidence, which would be absurd.
