RE: What's up
May 8, 2011 at 1:11 pm
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2011 at 1:11 pm by fr0d0.)
@ VOID whilst I have rarely used another posters comments, I don't do that all the time, which is what I accuse Nap of. You're jumping in to protect his stance is doing nothing to encourage his critical thinking skills. He can now continue to take pot shots relying on someone who might have a thought in their head to come along and fill in the blanks for him.
I did look at my agnostic reference last night after a couple of challenges, which I appreciate. I put that there after the thrashing out we did on this forum a while back. I'm thinking it isn't quite transparent to a new audience, and should really change it. You are right in that case VOID, that it's a lazy use of language. After all, when I said I can't know I'm only referring to empirical evidence, and not reasoning that would lead to concrete conclusions that would also qualify as knowledge.
Your interjection Rev was a snipe I felt, which didn't present anything to be refuted. I found that mildly irritating. No offense intended. I'd be glad to take up the forgiveness thread, as Tack hasn't responded.
I did look at my agnostic reference last night after a couple of challenges, which I appreciate. I put that there after the thrashing out we did on this forum a while back. I'm thinking it isn't quite transparent to a new audience, and should really change it. You are right in that case VOID, that it's a lazy use of language. After all, when I said I can't know I'm only referring to empirical evidence, and not reasoning that would lead to concrete conclusions that would also qualify as knowledge.
Your interjection Rev was a snipe I felt, which didn't present anything to be refuted. I found that mildly irritating. No offense intended. I'd be glad to take up the forgiveness thread, as Tack hasn't responded.
