(August 16, 2016 at 12:04 pm)SteveII Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 11:43 am)Crossless1 Wrote: So it's our job to show that your unfalsifiable claim is not true? That old game again?
Actually, no. That is not what the argument achieves. It simply removes the charge that belief in God is irrational, unjustifiable, or unwarranted. While it contributes to a cumulative argument for the existence of God, it does not prove it.
It also demonstrates that my experience-based belief in the flying-purple-people-eater is as equally rational, justified, and warranted as your belief in God. That doesn't taste so good going down, does it?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.