(August 16, 2016 at 11:14 pm)Jesster Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 11:13 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: We are talking about evidence (in principle).... what evidence do you want for this (it's really more logic based)? What evidence are you providing, for your claims here, so that I may have some context for my answer?
As I thought. You aren't bringing anything to the table here. I asked three times and got nothing. If you're going to keep spinning, I have a reasonable expectation of where this conversation is going.
I asked a number of questions, and keep getting answers such as above. You don't seem to want to talk about if the principles being described here can be used consistently. I didn't answer your questions, because it was a change of topic, and I'm trying to stay focused on having a valid (and consistent) epistemology, before we start trying to apply it.
This is what I came in with from the beginning, if you expected it to go somewhere else, then I fail to see how it is my fault.