(August 18, 2016 at 4:19 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 18, 2016 at 3:33 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I'll bite.... Your link and the descriptions seem reasonable (concerning the mandela effect). So how do we apply this?
In context, which of Steve's questions above, do you think more closely resembles the mandela effect? We all make mistakes, or remember something a little off.... at times. Some may be better at realizing that their memory is foggy in an area than others. Are scientist subject to the mandela effect as well or do the magic "tests and data" make them immune?
Lol, so you're going to play an idiot rather than admit you were wrong?
No talking about Steve. No talking about bible claims. YOU insisted on belaboring the point that we are strictly talking about the reliability of witness testimony, and it's weight as evidence.
I'm just responding within the conversation. To your question about the mandela effect, and the immediate context of what you quoted from Steve? I'm getting a little tire of you attacking me, rather than answering any questions or having a conversation. I even invited you to ask me questions about a particular instance in regards to the conversation (It can be about the Bible if you like).
Quote:Your position regarding testimony and evidence, applied to the Mandela Effect, would be that that many, MANY people testifying to a parallel universe slip is 'sufficient evidence' beyond a reasonable doubt that such a phenomenon is ACTUALLY happening.
No further evidence or testing required. People said so, and that many people couldn't be wrong, or be lying. Right? If you don't believe that parallel universe slips are happening, than you are ignoring valid evidence. Stay focused, RR. You can do this.
To what testimony are you referring concerning Parallel universe slips? I had seen a theory involving that, but not much reasoning (or any testimony) in the article.