Evolution in action.

[RoadRunner79]

You can always ask......

I think I just did, in an indirect way.  Now, care to provide an answer?

Well when speaking about evolution, I normally ask what they mean by evolution.
If you mean change and variation which is observed in species and in populations, then I think this is well evidenced, and really don't know anyone who denies this.
If you are talking about universal common descent, changing body plans over time, and developing novel complicated systems; I'm very skeptical. I do think that there is evidence for it, but also reasons against it (neither being conclusive or very strong). I find many of the claims overreaching what the evidence is, and principles that only apply when they confirm what is already believed. The third way in which the term evolution is also part of the problem for the second. I don't believe there is a mechanism which justifies the inferences being made in common descent. To be clearer, I think the neo-darwinian mechanism of random changes plus time is false. I don't think that there is any evidence for it, and that there are good reasons against it. I'll admit, that some of the other camps for a mechanism or the way in which evolution occurs, I have some familiarity with, but have never heard anything that peaked my interest enough to investigate further (as well as not being as popular). Here I would be more skeptical.

I believed in evolution mostly on faith (because I was told to), then I believed in theistic evolution (after I became a Christian), I learned more about evolution, and I am currently at the positions described above. I don't think that evolution is in conflict with my world view, or have ulterior positions that would need me to deny evolution.