(September 11, 2016 at 10:16 am)Whateverist Wrote:(September 11, 2016 at 9:57 am)fdesilva Wrote: If you agree that in the current instant nothing to the past exist then putting that past into memory does not solve the problem as then what you are saying is that memory, a set of events that are space like separated, are creating or is responsible for the "I" in that instant, which is impossible as nothing can connect simultaneous events
No, really, what are you trying to say? What is it you are trying so hard to figure out, what problem so desperately needs a solution? Everything is fine.
The problem that so desperately needs a solution is this. How are we able to see simultaneous events? If I look at a tree I see a multitude of events. How can I a single thing see a multitude of events?
Whatever answer you may think is valid, must satisfy the following truths.
1. Any event to the past or the future of the current instant in time does not exist.
2. Two or more events in the current instant cannot be connected.
