(September 18, 2016 at 8:40 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(September 17, 2016 at 1:17 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I do not find the images in most modern porn very titillating. Slapping a woman in the face with a penis is just stupid. Old vintage erotica with hair and clumsy sex is more realistic. Most porn is farcical at best. I think young male viewers of porn might get unrealistic views of what woman want out of sex . Erotica by women that shows women getting real pleasure might be healthier for young men to watch. Training videos before they venture off and disappoint some young gal. Young woman should learn to expect their sexual desires should be satisfied also. Then again, there are all types of folks and there is porn out there for them.
This is so important I want to quote it so it doesn't get lost. I have EXPERIENCED men who get their "moves" from porn, and I've had to patiently explain to the person how a lot of those things are for the visual stimulation of the MAN watching the movie, not for actually pleasuring the woman IN the movie. Porn presents such a distorted and inaccurate picture of mutual, pleasurable sex, it's laughable. Like...what is this business of the guy jack-hammering the girl's clitoris with his tongue like it's a punching bag?! (Was that too explicit? [emoji13] Sorry to the mods in advance!) Most porn willfully ignores the very basics of female sexual arousal and stimulation.
Guys...go at it all you want when it comes to porn; just please, don't extrapolate what you view to your IRL sexual partners. [emoji51]
Haha, this!
This brings me back to my comparison of porn to art. Just because you see it in an art museum, doesn't mean it should be repeated in reality. Keep it in the painting, please.
I don't believe you. Get over it.