So then you are saying that mono-chiral amino acids can be spontaneously generated on earth? No lab tests have ever shown that can even happen in the lab, much less in nature.
Actually life living in these conditions is what is irrelevant. That in no way proves that peptides could form naturally outside of the cell 3.5 million years ago. Let’s stay on topic here.
No I said that amino acids don’t align themselves naturally outside of the cell. The burden of proof is on you since you are the one claiming this is how life began 3.5 billion years ago. First prove this can happen in nature and then prove it did happen in nature 3.5 billion years ago.
You claimed you had historical documents proving that slavery in biblical times was like American slavery. When I challenged you to produce these documents you change the subject to whether or not slavery existed in those times? I am still waiting for these documents.
Ahh, so first it was “There is no evidence that the exodus ever occurred.” But after I pointed out that Nat-Geo found writings in Egyptian caves produced by Israelites that dated back to the times of Moses you just say, “Well Nat-Geo is wrong!” So let’s be clear here, there is plenty of evidence for the exodus, there is just no evidence you will accept because you are biased on such matters. As the quote below demonstrates, there is loads of evidence supporting the exodus.
Quote: “Before Moses, the Bible records that the Israelites were enslaved by their Egyptian hosts (Exodus 1:8-14). In the Brooklyn Museum (p.276, fig. 310) resides a papyrus scroll numbered Brooklyn 35:1446 which was acquired in the late 19th century by Charles Wilbour. This dates to the reign of Sobekhotep III, the predecessor of Neferhotep I and so the pharaoh who reigned one generation before Moses. This papyrus is a decree by the pharaoh for a transfer of slaves. Of the 95 names of slaves mentioned in the letter, 50% are Semitic in origin. What is more, it lists the names of these slaves in the original Semitic language and then adds the Egyptian name each had been assigned, which is something the Bible records the Egyptians as doing, cf. Joseph’s name given to him by pharaoh (Genesis 41:45). Some of the Semitic names are biblical and include:- Menahem, Issachar, Asher, and Shiprah (cf. Exodus 1:15-21).
That 50% of the names are Israelite means that there must have been a very large group of them in the Egyptian Delta at that time, corroborating the testimony of Exodus 1:7 which alludes to how numerous the Israelites became. The skeptics look for Israel in the Egypt of the Nineteenth Dynasty and remain sceptics, because the proof is in the Egypt of the Thirteenth Dynasty. The site of Avaris has been uncovered by the Austrian archaeologist Manfred Bietak in the land of Goshen underneath that of
the city of Ramesses. It provides plenty of proof, says Fulton, for Israel’s presence and sufferings in Egypt:
The people who lived in Avaris were not Egyptian but Asiatic Palestinian or Syrian. The finds there included numerous pottery fragments of Palestinian origin. Several factors about the graves were particularly fascinating:- 65% of the burials were of children under 18 months of age, the normal for this period being 20-30%. Could this be due to the killing of the male Israelite children by the Egyptians, recorded in Exodus 1:22? A disproportionately high number of adult women as opposed to adult men are buried here, again pointing to the slaughter of male Israelite babies. There are large numbers of long-haired Asiatic sheep buried which indicate these people to be shepherds. Large numbers of weapons found in the male graves indicate the warlike nature of the people.” – The Rohl Findings summarized by Dr. John Fulton
Even the Ipuwer Papyrus gives a detailed account of the Biblical plagues…
Quote: “‘Plague stalks through the land and blood is everywhere … the river is blood. Does a man drink from it? As a human he rejects it. He thirsts for water …. Nay, but gates, columns and walls are consumed with fire …. Nay but men are few. He that lays his brother in the ground is everywhere …. Nay but the son of the high-born man is no longer to be recognized …. The stranger people from outside are come into Egypt …. Nay, but corn has perished everywhere. People are stripped of clothing, perfume and oil. Everyone says “there is no more”. The storehouse is bare …. It has come to this. The king has been taken away by poor men.’
So you dodged my question a third time? I have a moral justification as to why slavery is wrong, I have asked for you to give one three times now and you have not. So is it safe for me to assume you have none? If you can’t justify why slavery is wrong, then why would you object to it being in the Bible?
I already answered that, it is impossible to provide logical confirmation of abiogenesis in the lab, so I would see no reason to drop my faith and run with something that has no logical basis.
