Pressuposition Apologetics Cross Examined

[Mister Agenda]

This from the guy who thinks his fucking god played in the dirt to make him.

This is not the "intro" forum, pal.  The gloves come off.

Ad hominem! Please don't muck up this thread, i'm waiting for a refutation.

---

There's nothing to actually refute. It's like saying you like the Buccaneers. OK, you like the Buccaneers, it has no bearing on whether or not they're a good team. If you're being asked what your favorite team is, or 'do you like the Buccaneers?', it's a fine answer. If you're being asked 'which football team is the best', what you like doesn't really answer that question. And if you're being asked 'Is God real?' and your answer is 'I presuppose that God is real', that doesn't really answer the question either. It is a nonsequitur. Presupposition is a fallacy unto itself, the argument from 'I assume I'm right'.