(October 27, 2016 at 8:51 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(October 27, 2016 at 8:34 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I had said... not normally
Not to me, at least not that I think. Which post? You did agree that there were vaccinations and autism.
So why not normally? They are certainly sincere. They are adamant. They are thousands if not more. They have well documented cases. They have found support in some of the health care community. When you combine all of their stories, that certainly makes for powerful testimony. What in their anecdotal evidence do you not find convincing or believable?
And could you compare/contrast the differences between your "not normally" position with this case and in other cases (your choice) where it would be "yes" (choose your own word if you find yes not fitting).
I may have responded to someone else.
I don't think that there is anything non-convincing or unbelievable in the anecdotes. However cherry picking data, or making a hasty generalization about what is normal based a limited accounts is not correct either.