A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"

[Drich]

Maybe wash the blood out of your eyes and go back and reread the beginning of that thread. Nothing has changed. You guys were blinded by your own version of righteousness. You could not see past the emojis I used, and my non compliance to social protocol.

Oh, fuck off.  You got caught out being a cunt, and you're not adult enough to admit it.

Facts were not apart of your witch hunt. Which is the real problem I was trying to address or at least point out. That if someone triggers a righteous/moral outrage cycle by saying the wrong word or not complying to the doctrine of tolerance that you all tend to turn off all of your 'higher thinking' and become the monsters you are hunting.

"Waitress, could I get a side-order of rationalization with my hypocrisy?"

When you work this hard at ex post facto spincraft, I know I've hit my mark, and spot-on, too.

You're an idiot and a hypocrite, and probably have more than a touch of the sociopath about you.

I can admit anything, i simply choose not to. Because being a 'c' proves my point. that if you can properly be identified as being a 'c' then you forfeit your rights as being treated as human being. That you have to play by your moral code inorder to garner any level of human decency.

So then the next step of mine would be to show you how quickly religious people are labeled 'c's.

Then i can show you on a national scale how one presidential candidate WHOLE Campaign is about labeling her opponent a 'c'.

Then what's worse... I can show via poll numbers that, the perception of electing a 'c' overrides ANY Evil or wrong doing the person who accuses another of being a 'c' does herself.

Why? Because you have traded God for your society's 'morality.' Your 'morality' is all the good you 'good people' have. To trade or compromise this 'good' Can be a matter of the destruction of selfworth or even the obliteration of your identity. (which is why d-bags threaten to leave if trump is elected.) So then whom ever controls your morality (whomever makes the rules that defines what a "C" is) has control over you, the way you think, the way you live, and vote.

To illustrate this I may myself a 'c.' I did not follow the rape victim protocol

Then after everyone in their own way acknoweledged that they thought I was a 'c', I shared with you all that I myself am one who it is you think you are trying to protect. But none of that mattered because I was a 'c' first. Which gave you the right to be as immoral as what you thought I was.

So again, tell me who the hypocrite is???

My big picture point is that when people go into atheism they are fleeing from what they think is a way for the church/church leaders to control what you say do and think, into a soceity who does the same exact thing just on a level most of you have been trained to over look.

Again, if you do not think so look at the ONLY tactic being employed by the clinton campain.. No issues are being discussed anymore, (outside of making trump look like a 'c'.) No plans, or future polices. I have no idea what clinton even stands for outside of the 4 points that is listed on her website: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/
her resume
153 things trump said that makes him a 'c'
the things that make clinton 'moral' (in contrast to trump being a c)
the letters from 'moral' republicans who cant vote for trump.

Again, absolutely nothing concerning her projected projects and or functions as POTUS.

Why? because people like you, are not programmed for facts anymore. you've been trained to seek out and destroy 'intollerant' people, and clinton's whole campain at this point is betting the farm on your 'moral' programming.

But again, how subjective is that? who gets to label who is and is not intolerant/immoral/a 'c'?

Who's next? meaning the american indians had their turn in the barrel, and then it was the jews... who, oh who will clinton label 'intolerant?'