(November 20, 2016 at 9:37 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:(November 20, 2016 at 11:55 am)Mathilda Wrote: None of which work are trained in AI.
['i'] Suzanne has initialized an Artificial intelligence firm, predominantly consisting of the brightest minds amidst artificial intelligence.
['ii'] Tegmark's recent paper, "Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?", is an apt, initial formalization qua deep neural networks.
['iii'] Sam Harris' practice compounds amidst neuroscience. He has logically recognized of the likelihood of sentient artificial intellect.
['iv'] Mathilda's contribution is unfounded.
A former quantum physicist according to you has created a start-up working in AI but doesn't do the AI herself. In my personal experience, people who create start-ups have to bullshit and really sell what they can do in order to bring in more funding or get bought out. That was most certainly the case in my last job which was a start-up in AI. This is predominantly how I managed to get most of my own AI experience in industry.
A cosmologist has managed to write and publish a single paper on deep learning. Well I am glad. But trained neural networks are not sufficient for strong AI. Just because it's called Deep Learning and relies on a statistical model inspired by neural networks is just a drop in the ocean that is the challenge of AI.
Sam Harris did a PhD in Neuroscience but has no post doctoral experience as far as anyone can tell. And his PhD involved scanning brains of religious people. A valid PhD but doesn't tell him anything about how the brain actually functions. Sam Harris's main experience is in selling himself as a media personality.
I personally have a PhD in biologically plausible Artificial Intelligence and self organization, post doctoral experience in academia and industry and peer reviewed papers.
What has your contribution been?
