An Inconvenient Question(s)

[Rayaan]

Removal of the foreskin is to destroy this. And I don't see how one can remove skin from female genitals without at least slightly damaging their capacity for pleasure.

Removal does destroy the foreskin, but I don't think this is harmful, so that's why I don't think of it as an example of "mutilation." Mutilation seems to have a more negative impact on the body than a simple removal of the foreskin. Also, I think the rest of the organ works just as fine as before. I've been circumcised and I don't have any problems. But again, I'm not a doctor or medical expert on this topic. And I don't know about reducing the capacity for pleasure nor what it's like for a female. So maybe you're right.

Doing everything 'normally' is not akin to doing some things more excellently

I concur, but, I don't know what are those things which an un-circumcised person can do more excellently than a circumcised person. I don't know if that's true in the first place.