RE: An Inconvenient Question(s)
June 16, 2011 at 5:59 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2011 at 8:03 pm by Atheist Jew.)
Dear Rayaan,
1. I never said it was altered after his death. Let us just pretend this question never existed because it is wasting my time. To replace it:
2. During this "short span of time" the Quran was compiled and distributed. Why do you think that the number of Christians went through the roof after the Bible was released?
3. Lets not forget Saudia Arabia and Pakistan and Chechenya(yes I know it is not the correct spelling). Ummm...actually that is just your interpretation, and where are these verses you talk about? And, yes, an incident 500 years ago CAN be used to justify that since they did not leave you in peace the entire time.
4. More links, just what I asked for. Ermmm...I did also mention other things, so do please at least try to use my entire quote and not just pick n' choose bits of it. Anyhow, I did not mean invade in the military sense. I meant that the American culture, a symbol of Western "civilation", has values that are not considered good in an Islamic sense, and therefore can conflict with Muslim cultures. And, yes, the #1 Worst American President since Reagan and G. Dubya's father were in the office did make the case for a useless war, everybody knows that. And the instant we get out of those countries, the "governments" will collapse, and it is back to Islamic fundamentalism...I mean "extremism".
5. This should also refute your answers to questions 1 and 2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Qur'an
6. Read this post by theVOID from the thread "Atheism VS the Quran":
"I shouldn't even need to point out how utterly arbitrary that is, but it was so fucking easy to refute that I couldn't resit. Again with reference to the Confucians.
Refutation by parallel argument:
The challenge is to produce a Traditional Chinese Confucian poem of less than thirteen lines than contain all possible dictates regarding how a junior should treat a senior, without forming incomplete sentences or resembling any of the classics in language or style or becoming self-refuting, hasty or rhetorical.
If you can't do that Confucian teachings are all true and necessarily divinely inspired, agreed?"
1. I never said it was altered after his death. Let us just pretend this question never existed because it is wasting my time. To replace it:
2. During this "short span of time" the Quran was compiled and distributed. Why do you think that the number of Christians went through the roof after the Bible was released?
3. Lets not forget Saudia Arabia and Pakistan and Chechenya(yes I know it is not the correct spelling). Ummm...actually that is just your interpretation, and where are these verses you talk about? And, yes, an incident 500 years ago CAN be used to justify that since they did not leave you in peace the entire time.
4. More links, just what I asked for. Ermmm...I did also mention other things, so do please at least try to use my entire quote and not just pick n' choose bits of it. Anyhow, I did not mean invade in the military sense. I meant that the American culture, a symbol of Western "civilation", has values that are not considered good in an Islamic sense, and therefore can conflict with Muslim cultures. And, yes, the #1 Worst American President since Reagan and G. Dubya's father were in the office did make the case for a useless war, everybody knows that. And the instant we get out of those countries, the "governments" will collapse, and it is back to Islamic fundamentalism...I mean "extremism".
5. This should also refute your answers to questions 1 and 2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Qur'an
6. Read this post by theVOID from the thread "Atheism VS the Quran":
"I shouldn't even need to point out how utterly arbitrary that is, but it was so fucking easy to refute that I couldn't resit. Again with reference to the Confucians.
Refutation by parallel argument:
The challenge is to produce a Traditional Chinese Confucian poem of less than thirteen lines than contain all possible dictates regarding how a junior should treat a senior, without forming incomplete sentences or resembling any of the classics in language or style or becoming self-refuting, hasty or rhetorical.
If you can't do that Confucian teachings are all true and necessarily divinely inspired, agreed?"
