RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 6:43 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 6:48 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'
Whoopsy.
Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan. Do you a world of good.
Boru
Would you care to explain the whoopsy?
Something to keep in mind:
Nowhere did I state that the observation of your redundant signature was of absolute nature.
As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.
Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.
Probabilities are observed to give rise to life, and the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.