(January 26, 2017 at 5:57 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:(January 25, 2017 at 11:24 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: My first inclination with this, was to wait for more information (something a little more than gossip). It seems that I was right to do so.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intellige...-is-false/
I can understand the fears, I have them to. It would be the same if Hillary had won. However, I think the important question is, wether you where hoping this story was correct or not?
So your source for "authoritative" comment is a blog by an idiot creatard liar? Wow, RoadRunneer this is a new low, even for you.
Is that as low as name calling, and resorting to the genetic fallacy? Also they do cite back to Reuters if you would prefer.
And again, I'm still waiting for a little more direct and detailed testimony, for evidence; rather than what appears to be vague gossip. Here we do have a reputable news source, referring to an official statement by one of the agencies.
While I do fear, that too many on both sides are heading in this direction; I also have hope that we haven't gotten to that point yet. Or at least, that it doesn't escalate further.
But I think that ideas should be judged based on their content and reasons, not based on the source or its conclusion.