A question to all atheists!

[Gestas]

So assume that time is interwoven with the natural world and answer the hypothetical...

---

Not if the pre 20th century notions are correct. To say something is incorrect just because it is old is a logical fallacy. You need do better than that.


So let's start from the beginning (lul).

What is wrong with the idea that time is interwoven in the natural world?

What is wrong with the idea that time is independent of the natural world?

Who said there is?  And who said there is anything wrong with the idea of a past-eternal natural world?  

My point is, you are failing miserably at making any point at all.  You aren't going to pigeon-hole anyone here into making a positive claim on the nature of existence that is not supported by evidence.

Your question is meaningless, and I don't think you understand what atheism is.  Feel free to try again, though.

I certainly didn't say anything about there being anything wrong with a past-eternal natural world; I said that's the most logical answer an atheist can give. But when I said that, your friend told me I'm basing that on pre 20th century ideas.

No, I'm making a point, and I see it very clearly. You may not though which, given your previous posts, doesn't surprise me. I don't think the squirrels outside of my window would be able to understand my point either.

I like the other chick better (in the black turtle neck). She's smarter, prettier, and less annoying. She was able to answer the question right away without any hassle.