Sometimes theists try to find ingenious ways round logical impossibilities regarding God. My personal favourite is the one which claims how he is not restricted by logic so using logical
arguments to deny his existence is therefore self defeating. But if as they also claim the mind of God cannot be known then how can they claim he is not restricted by logic? Now once
your opponent denies all logic then there is zero point in debating them. Arguments where the premises or conclusion are devoid of any are not arguments any way but just assertions
arguments to deny his existence is therefore self defeating. But if as they also claim the mind of God cannot be known then how can they claim he is not restricted by logic? Now once
your opponent denies all logic then there is zero point in debating them. Arguments where the premises or conclusion are devoid of any are not arguments any way but just assertions
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN