RE: LHC disproves ghosts
February 24, 2017 at 11:37 am
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 11:38 am by Huggy Bear.)
(February 23, 2017 at 6:54 am)pocaracas Wrote:*emphasis mine*(February 22, 2017 at 10:48 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Really dude? That's the same definition for species.
form the same site
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/species?s=t
You've called me disingenuous a number of times, what would you call what you just tried to pull?
Heck If you would just look down a little further in your own link for "kind", you'd see
So yeah, they mean the same thing.
I didn't scroll down that far...
Goes to show how it's just some common usage of the word...
Hey, synonyms!
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/species?s=t
Quote: breed
category
collection
description
division
group
kind
likes
lot
nature
number
order
sort
stripe
type
yeah... better be careful with those...
In Biology, kind is an imprecise word that is best avoided.
Don't even try It. Before I address the rest of your post, we're going to settle this first.
"kind" is not an imprecise word, It was mentioned in the definition for species.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/species?s=t
Quote:Species
1. a class of individuals having some common characteristics or qualities; distinct sort or kind.
I posted the definition from biology-online because I wanted the definition as it pertained to biology, but my source wasn't good enough for you remember? You were LOL'ing at it actually, ok fine.
Now that YOUR source proves that your wrong, you want to talk about "In Biology, kind is an imprecise word".... Too late for that since you refused to accept the definition from a site focused on biology.
The only thing left for you to do is admit you were wrong, and acknowledge that "kind" and "species" mean the same thing.