Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 1, 2024, 8:40 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LHC disproves ghosts
#77
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 24, 2017 at 11:58 am)pocaracas Wrote:
(February 24, 2017 at 11:37 am)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Don't even try It. Before I address the rest of your post, we're  going to settle this first.

"kind" is not an imprecise word, It was mentioned in the definition for species.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/species?s=t

I posted the definition from biology-online because I wanted the definition as it pertained to biology, but my source wasn't good enough for you remember? You were LOL'ing at it actually, ok fine.

Now that YOUR source proves that your wrong, you want to talk about "In Biology, kind is an imprecise word"....   Too late for that since you refused to accept the definition from a site focused on biology.

The only thing left for you to do is admit you were wrong, and acknowledge that "kind" and "species" mean the same thing.

okay... if that's how you want to play it...
Your "biology" source used Ray Comfort and the bible as references for accepting "kind" as equivalent to species... If that's how things work on that site, then I'm not going to trust it. I told you so.
Oh, and look at how they describe their dictionary: " an editable-dictionary with thousands of terms".... editable... makes you wonder who added those references to Comfort and the Bible...

My source has kind as a synonym for species... but it's not a synonym for a biological species...well... actually, it's not defined...
Maybe this other source will help:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Species+(biology)
Quote:spe·cies  (spē′shēz, -sēz)
n. pl. species
1. Biology A group of closely related organisms that are very similar to each other and are usually capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring. The species is the fundamental category of taxonomic classification, ranking below a genus or subgenus. Species names are represented in binomial nomenclature by an uncapitalized Latin adjective or noun following a capitalized genus name, as in Ananas comosus, the pineapple, and Equus caballus, the horse.
2. Logic A class of individuals or objects grouped by virtue of their common attributes and assigned a common name; a division subordinate to a genus.
3. Chemistry A set of atoms, molecules, ions, or other chemical entities that possess the same distinct characteristics with respect to a chemical process or measurement.
4. A kind, variety, or type: "No species of performing artist is as self-critical as a dancer" (Susan Sontag).
5. Roman Catholic Church
a. The outward appearance or form of the Eucharistic elements that is retained after their consecration.
b. Either of the consecrated elements of the Eucharist.


Note that it's "kind", outside of biology.

I thought you'd get that detail from the list of synonyms I gave you, courtesy of the thesaurus... but no...
Shall I proceed in teaching you that the same word can have several meanings? And each meaning has it's own synonyms?
And, in Biology, that synonym doesn't work?
Context matters in English... who'da thunk?

Oh, so now were going to double down?

In the Bible "kind" and "sort" refers to "species", no if and's or buts, in fact if you look at some of the newer translations, "kind" is translated to "species".

Quote:Genesis 1 King James Version (KJV)
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Quote:Genesis 1 Tree of Life Version (TLV)
21 Then God created the large sea creatures and every living creature that crawls, with which the water swarms, according to their species, as well as every winged flying creature, according to their species. And God saw that it was good.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

Quote:In his biology, Aristotle used the term γένος (génos) to mean a kind, such as a bird or fish, and εἶδος (eidos) to mean a specific form within a kind, such as (within the birds) the crane, eagle, crow, or sparrow. A kind was distinguished by its attributes; for instance, a bird has feathers, a beak, wings, a hard-shelled egg, and warm blood. A form was distinguished by being shared by all its members, the young inheriting any variations they might have from their parents. Aristotle believed all kinds and forms to be distinct and unchanging. His approach remained influential until the Renaissance


There you go, "kind" used in the context of biology, what now?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 18, 2017 at 9:24 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 18, 2017 at 9:47 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 18, 2017 at 10:30 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 18, 2017 at 10:55 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 18, 2017 at 11:10 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Alex K - February 19, 2017 at 2:34 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 19, 2017 at 2:46 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by RozKek - February 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Thumpalumpacus - February 18, 2017 at 9:51 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by ignoramus - February 18, 2017 at 11:05 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Edwardo Piet - February 18, 2017 at 11:37 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Neo-Scholastic - February 19, 2017 at 1:52 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Thumpalumpacus - February 19, 2017 at 2:13 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by ignoramus - February 19, 2017 at 2:27 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Neo-Scholastic - February 21, 2017 at 11:11 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 18, 2017 at 9:58 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 18, 2017 at 11:06 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by vorlon13 - February 18, 2017 at 11:09 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 18, 2017 at 11:11 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Edwardo Piet - February 18, 2017 at 10:15 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 18, 2017 at 10:17 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by paulpablo - February 19, 2017 at 2:08 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 2:17 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - February 18, 2017 at 11:11 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 18, 2017 at 11:18 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 18, 2017 at 11:19 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - February 18, 2017 at 11:58 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 19, 2017 at 12:08 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 12:41 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 12:44 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 19, 2017 at 1:17 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 1:20 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 1:24 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 19, 2017 at 1:30 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 19, 2017 at 1:23 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 1:28 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 1:27 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 1:30 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 1:48 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 19, 2017 at 1:57 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 19, 2017 at 2:16 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 19, 2017 at 7:28 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 12:50 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 21, 2017 at 9:18 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 21, 2017 at 9:23 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 10:42 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 21, 2017 at 11:07 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 12:01 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 21, 2017 at 12:22 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 1:02 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 21, 2017 at 3:25 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 8:44 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 22, 2017 at 5:36 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 22, 2017 at 1:12 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 22, 2017 at 1:53 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 22, 2017 at 10:48 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 23, 2017 at 3:28 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 23, 2017 at 6:54 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 24, 2017 at 11:37 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 24, 2017 at 11:58 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 24, 2017 at 2:12 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by pocaracas - February 24, 2017 at 3:47 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 24, 2017 at 8:35 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 26, 2017 at 3:29 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 27, 2017 at 1:08 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 1:01 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Thumpalumpacus - February 19, 2017 at 1:11 pm
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 19, 2017 at 1:35 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by frankiej - February 19, 2017 at 1:39 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by I_am_not_mafia - February 19, 2017 at 4:08 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by LastPoet - February 19, 2017 at 1:38 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Mr Greene - February 19, 2017 at 2:35 pm
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 21, 2017 at 8:06 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 21, 2017 at 8:40 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 21, 2017 at 8:49 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Neo-Scholastic - February 21, 2017 at 10:53 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 21, 2017 at 10:18 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 21, 2017 at 11:05 am
LHC disproves ghosts - by KUSA - February 21, 2017 at 1:25 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Alex K - February 23, 2017 at 9:32 am
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 24, 2017 at 2:34 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Huggy Bear - February 24, 2017 at 2:45 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Anomalocaris - February 24, 2017 at 4:23 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by dyresand - February 24, 2017 at 4:59 pm
RE: LHC disproves ghosts - by Alex K - February 24, 2017 at 5:46 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)