(March 2, 2017 at 9:40 pm)pool the matey Wrote:(March 2, 2017 at 2:29 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Pool, say technology was developed to transfer a fetus to a man to carry. Meanwhile, a mother somewhere is unable to carry a fetus to term. Would you support forcing the father to carry it?
First of all, I wouldn't classify it as "forcing" at all. If a mother is incapable of carrying the child and the father is alive and well then it would be his duty to do it because the child is his too. So yeah, provided that kind of technology exists it would make sense for a father to do it.
If the father has a duty to do something, and they say "Fuck you I'm not putting that thing in my tummy", is that the end of the discussion? Give up on the baby and let the man go about his business like he was before?