RE: Media
April 12, 2017 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2017 at 1:50 am by Harris.)
(April 10, 2017 at 4:42 pm)Isis Wrote: I suggest you check out the "Damned Jews" thread. Every religion and cult out there is criticised here, you can find most of the threads on Minimalists' profile. You on the other hand always single out the Jews and their Talmud while conveniently ignoring the horrible things in the Qur'an.
In place of uttering “Quran is horrible” it would be more effective if you provide few examples of the “horrible things in the Quran.” I am sure you would get a good bit of appreciation from Jews, agnostics, and atheists for this.
Generally, Jewish criticism is simply a gigantic meaningless noise in thin air. It is loud enough to reach all corners of the earth. It is meaningless because generally, it is a blatant lie or at best is a blend of lies and twisted realities. It is loud because normally people believe in loud and recurring statements which furnish a small corridor for the culprits to make their quick manoeuvres and cause intended harm through that felonious propaganda.
I am sure if there would be a slightest possibility to deprecate Quran or Bible regardless justly or falsely, everyone in atheist forum would hastily jump over that train. On the other hand, I have provided undeniable facts about Talmud and about the harm caused by the Jewish deceptions and no one is even willing to see them. Here you have the bias.
Generally, Jewish criticism is simply a gigantic meaningless noise in thin air. It is loud enough to reach all corners of the earth. It is meaningless because generally, it is a blatant lie or at best is a blend of lies and twisted realities. It is loud because normally people believe in loud and recurring statements which furnish a small corridor for the culprits to make their quick manoeuvres and cause intended harm through that felonious propaganda.
I am sure if there would be a slightest possibility to deprecate Quran or Bible regardless justly or falsely, everyone in atheist forum would hastily jump over that train. On the other hand, I have provided undeniable facts about Talmud and about the harm caused by the Jewish deceptions and no one is even willing to see them. Here you have the bias.
(April 10, 2017 at 11:23 pm)bennyboy Wrote: What's the point of people making comments if you refuse to read them or understand them?
There are Christians here arguing against atheism, quoting scripture and so on. We verbally wreck them, because we think their ideas are weak and pointless.
There are Muslims here arguing against atheism, quoting scripture and so on. We verbally wreck them, because we think their ideas are weak and pointless.
There are no Jews here arguing against atheism or quoting scripture. Nor are their Jews either waking us up on Saturday morning preaching their ideology, nor are their Jews attempting to attack our way of life. We do not NEED to verbally wreck them, because there is nothing to fight against.
Do you not get this? If you don't, then you're a pretty dense person.
"To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly."
Libbre David 37
"A goy (Gentile) who enquires into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Sanhedrin 59a
I think above two statements give a clear sense that Jews cannot preach transgression openly in public. To preach crime and corruption they need a suitable medium and atheism provides an ideal medium for spreading immorality.
Whether under the pretext of communism or secularism, Jews are vigorously promoting atheism among the goyim to deflate their morals. Therefore, naturally, they urge a friendly and feasible environment for the success of atheism.
Only a slave of his own desires can reject the belief in God or develop a belief in being a chosen one. In any sense, unscrupulous hedonist cannot be a moral person and consequently immoral person is prone to be harmful for the society. How harmful the members of a society would be that much success Jews would get in transforming morality into prostitution and corruption.
“There was nothing in the whole world to make men love their neighbours. That there was no law of nature that man should love mankind, and that, if there had been any love on earth hitherto, it was not owing to a natural law, but simply because men have believed in immortality. … the whole natural law lies in that faith, and that if you were to destroy in mankind the belief in immortality, not only love but every living force maintaining the life of the world would at once be dried up. Moreover, nothing then would be immoral, everything would be lawful, even cannibalism. That’s not all … for every individual, like ourselves, who does not believe in God or immortality, the moral law of nature must immediately be changed into the exact contrary of the former religious law, and that egoism, even to crime, must become not only lawful but even recognised as the inevitable, the most rational, even honourable outcome of his position.”
Dostoyevsky
Libbre David 37
"A goy (Gentile) who enquires into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
Sanhedrin 59a
I think above two statements give a clear sense that Jews cannot preach transgression openly in public. To preach crime and corruption they need a suitable medium and atheism provides an ideal medium for spreading immorality.
Whether under the pretext of communism or secularism, Jews are vigorously promoting atheism among the goyim to deflate their morals. Therefore, naturally, they urge a friendly and feasible environment for the success of atheism.
Only a slave of his own desires can reject the belief in God or develop a belief in being a chosen one. In any sense, unscrupulous hedonist cannot be a moral person and consequently immoral person is prone to be harmful for the society. How harmful the members of a society would be that much success Jews would get in transforming morality into prostitution and corruption.
“There was nothing in the whole world to make men love their neighbours. That there was no law of nature that man should love mankind, and that, if there had been any love on earth hitherto, it was not owing to a natural law, but simply because men have believed in immortality. … the whole natural law lies in that faith, and that if you were to destroy in mankind the belief in immortality, not only love but every living force maintaining the life of the world would at once be dried up. Moreover, nothing then would be immoral, everything would be lawful, even cannibalism. That’s not all … for every individual, like ourselves, who does not believe in God or immortality, the moral law of nature must immediately be changed into the exact contrary of the former religious law, and that egoism, even to crime, must become not only lawful but even recognised as the inevitable, the most rational, even honourable outcome of his position.”
Dostoyevsky
