RE: Tucker Carlson launches "Men In America"... during women's history month
March 9, 2018 at 4:47 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 4:51 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(March 9, 2018 at 7:38 am)alpha male Wrote:(March 8, 2018 at 9:02 pm)Grandizer Wrote: They're two "macho" men coming into this thread to have a go at women
I love women. You're the misogynists. Designating one month as women's history month implies that the other eleven are for men.
No, it doesn’t. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
(March 8, 2018 at 1:28 pm)A Theist Wrote:(March 8, 2018 at 1:08 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Can always count on you to be the Retard of the Moment.Can always count on you being a dim witted WLB.
Nah, that’s your president. 😉
(March 9, 2018 at 12:24 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 7:38 am)I Talpha male Wrote: I love women. You're the misogynists. Designating one month as women's history month implies that the other eleven are for men.
Not really. It’s about highlighting women’s history, nothing else. Women’s contributions to history / society are studied during the other 11 months as well. There is just a special focus on them for women’s history months.
To purposefully launch a series about male empowerment during women’s history month comes across as assholish.
I’m not opposed to male empowerment, I’m an egalitarian after all. I’m not opposed to a “men’s history month” if you really want to do one either. The timing here ruins the whole thing, makes it seem like a competition or a challenge/response.
I think the technical term is, “butt-hurt”. 😏
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
