(May 19, 2009 at 2:49 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(May 19, 2009 at 2:40 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: At what point did ANY of us say, admit or even imply that science equates to theology? No one is, as far as I know, denying that the creationists and IDC's are wingnuts but ANY religious claim (any claim to the spiritual for which there is no evidence) is the same and the only difference is a matter of degree. IOW you're ALL whack-jobs, the only question is exactly how whacky you are!
You're using science to dismiss theology. Therefore you are saying theology is definable BY science (ie that it's not a subject). Therefore you are with the wingnuts in crossing over the two.
It does not follow that using science to dismiss theology equates to being a wingnut because nothing supernatural haves EVER Been demonstrated to be and THAT (the utter lack of any supporting evidence) is a scientific issue.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator